Showing posts with label dance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dance. Show all posts

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Double Yellow Lines: Dance and music at their closest

At first, the stage is dark, oppressively so. A dim light brings the piano’s keyboard into the scene, while the spotlight gradually turns to reveal a figure, clad completely in black. This is dance and music, stripped down to their bare essentials: no frills, no fireworks, no fancy moves; yet the dramatic tension in each note, in each and every move, leaves the air almost palpitating. 

As An Tôn Thất’s  impressionistic music drifts ephemerally, another figure—also dressed in black save for a white shirt—enters, pulling the other back from the invisible fourth wall which he is just about to shatter. Huang Yi’s inventiveness is unbelievable: now the music is no longer “music”, but rather the sounds of a pen on paper, the clinking of a glass, the breaking of pencils, yet his movements would lead one to believe he was being led by an entire symphony of sounds. 

An’s music then takes a classical turn, at times baroque even, as Huang Yi and Hu Jian engage in a pas de deux reminiscent of Norman McLaren’s animation, set to Bach, in Thirty-Two Short Films About Glenn Gould. As the music then returns to its beginning sparse texture, the two parallel lines of Huang Yi and Hu Jian converge on the piano, and as the two alternate their turns and twists on the keyboard, music and movement merge into a single monochrome. An then returns, building the music up into a sonorous symphony of sound, with six hands on the piano. This then fades out, with the piece ending on a song sung by Hu Jian to sparse chords, echoing the beginning. Lights fade out, drawing out a full circle.

Is this piece music or dance? Saying that it is “both” is an understatement, since all the elements melt together into an organic whole, until one cannot be separated from the other. Narrative is absent, nor is it ever needed: as Huang Yi says in his program notes, “Everyone can have a different interpretation… all that I want to convey is in the work.” Yet as I left the theatre, I still had one question in mind: why yellow?


Sunday, March 4, 2012

YogeeTi: Breathtaking, exhilarating, uneven

As part of the 2012 Taiwan International Festival of Arts, YogeeTi has certainly benefited from funding and marketing most artists could only dream of. Much like the earlier production of The Tempest (the subject of a future entry), I was drawn to the show after seeing quite a number of reviews lauding this piece. While it was certainly great fun to watch, as I left the theatre I couldn't help but feel somewhat ambivalent toward what I had just experienced.

Much of the hype of this piece has been centered on the fashion design element, and clearly it shows: aside from the exquisite stage design and impressive use of props, the evocative lighting and excellent music all serve to create a terrific ambiance. Yet the actual dancing, however consistently brilliant it was, at times nevertheless seemed to fall flat. After a truly dazzling section where the “weaving” theme is brought into full relief through strings drawn in from the wings, accompanied by the aptly minimalistic score and the interwoven choreography, there follows a longish “showcase” with every dancer doing solos or duos, seemingly just for the sake of it. The pre-show lecture mentioned that Johan Ku caught the attention of Mourad Merzouki with a cocoon-themed exhibition, but the interaction with with cocoon costumes today, looking as if covered with moss or algae, would not have seen out of place if it were used as a filler for a stage production of Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters. Also, I failed to detect a coherent flow throughout the piece; sometimes it seemed as if the performance could just about close at the end of any section, without sacrificing anything at all.

Perhaps what I couldn't reconcile the most, though, was the sense of emptiness inside even before the first sound of applause had struck. Impressive, yes; breathtaking, yes; but a sense of connection? After sitting in my seat for more than an hour, I didn't feel I could take away anything from the experience. I was reminded of what Pak Sal said of Jérôme Bel in his interview before returning to Indonesia: his works inevitably invoke controversy, and probably justifiably so; yet this is not done for just shock value, just "for the sake of it", but because he has a strong central concept or message which cannot be conveyed anyway else. Just as I was leaving the theatre, I happened to meet a friend sitting in the row behind me; she said that she fell asleep during the middle, and frankly I don't blame her (especially since this was, after all, a matinee performance).

But in any case, the audience clearly loved today's performance; the entire hall was roaring and cheering like mad throughout the countless curtain calls, and the dancers clearly enjoyed the reception as well. And in the end, that's what matters in performance art, isn't it: never mind there is a profound message to take away, we're here to enjoy ourselves, to have a good time!

Saturday, November 26, 2011

近日二場觀舞心得:「我學錯東西了」

太久沒寫東西了!雖然我在年初第三度重新開始寫部落格是想要記錄中東革命的發展,但一路看下來我發現自己沒辦法發出什麼具體的意見(除了有一次BBC World Have Your Say節目唸到我的留言以外),漸漸就沒有動力再寫東西了。

最近不想一直在家裡發呆,又想說之前在舞蹈系工作卻對舞蹈不夠關心,所以一時興趣就去看了兩場表演:上星期五去景美人權文化園區看安娜琪舞蹈劇場的《第七感官》,今天去台北另一端(應該說是捷運淡水線的另一端)的竹圍工作室看舞蹈生態系的《結晶體》。看下來的結論:我學錯東西了——或說,我不知道我以前在封閉什麼。

景美人權文化園區在秀朗橋下,這麼偏僻的地方我以前竟然常來……一方面,拉絃樂器的人會知道高憶玫老師的工作室就在附近;另一方面,在國防部底下單位當過兵的人在分發到部隊前應該也在隔壁(不對,還不能說隔壁,因為門口的地方連牆都沒有)的保養場上過課。《第七感官》是一個「觀賞環境建置計畫」,不光是舞蹈而已,表演環境也會跟表演者互動,甚至還把觀眾帶進表演裡一起互動:


Seventh Sense - Excerpt 1 from Jeff Hsieh on Vimeo.


Seventh Sense - Excerpt 3 from Jeff Hsieh on Vimeo.


Seventh Sense - Excerpt 4 from Jeff Hsieh on Vimeo.

我索票的時候不知道為什麼刻意選了舞台上面的「搖滾區」,之後一直覺得怕怕的,還問杰樺老大坐搖滾區會不會很可怕。但是在表演的時候就覺得之前根本是在白擔心。表演正式開始之前,兩位舞者就已經在台上跟科技投影互動,搖滾區的觀眾也要一個個進去跟投影和舞者一起動;在剛剛踏進去的那一瞬間,覺得突然被很多人看好像怪怪的,但沒多久就融入情境,可以放得開在舞台上玩。唯一比較可惜的是,表演真正開始之後,舞者跟觀眾的互動反而還沒有那麼多。不過,這場表演確實是一種不一樣的體驗,甚至是以前我自己從來沒想過的。音樂表演是可以把環境當成演出的一部份,運用燈光和科技讓觀眾不只是在聽表演、看表演,而是直接「進入」表演;我覺得Terry Riley的《太陽光環》(Sun Rings)就是很成功的作品,今年前半年Kronos Quartet來台灣的時候就是表演這首曲子:


Kronos Quartet: Sun Rings from kq kq on Vimeo.

不過,觀眾就算能夠「進入」這種表演裡,基於音樂演奏本身的限制,無法讓觀眾「融入」表演中,成為演出的一部份;John Cage的4'33"雖然大部份是由觀眾的聲音構成的,但觀眾再怎麼樣都還是與台上的「表演者」隔開,兩方之間無法互動。《第七感官》裡觀眾參與表演的比例雖然不多,但已經讓我開始質疑以前為何那麼堅持表演的「正式」形式,為何非要是表演者/被看者與觀眾/看人者的二元對立。我後來在想,這種隔閡與距離是不是我後來那麼不喜歡音樂表演的另一個原因(最大的原因仍是薩伊德在Musical Elaborations裡所說的"Performance as an extreme occasion"),因為即使我不能算真正的表演者,我在台上跟舞者互動都覺得有在貼近「人」,反而比起音樂表演更有身而為人的「人性」。我甚至覺得,當初我學錯東西了,不應該學音樂,應該學跳舞才對!

(星期二我回去舞蹈系的時候跟某葉姓助教提到這件事,據說他後來有跟平老師說?)

如果上週的表演讓我重新思考我為什麼不喜歡表演,今天的《結晶體》反而讓我想要再投入表演裡!最大的原因是表演的配樂有現場大提琴演奏。我必須說,我看不太懂舞蹈生態系在這個作品裡想要透過肢體語言表達什麼,看了節目單上的文字仍然不懂(說真的,上回他們在跨藝的表演我也不知道他們在做什麼),但看到現場大提琴、預錄的音樂、現場音效sampling和舞者肢體動作之間的互動實在是太奇妙。表演後跟大提琴手聊了一下,她說她的音樂有一部份是表演時看舞者即興的,舞者的動作與音樂之間有某種不確性;這似乎與《第七感官》裡舞者與觀眾互動的不確定性有異曲同工之妙。另外,今天的表演似乎也引證我之前的想法:有些光聽音樂會覺得莫名其妙的現代音樂,在肢體動作的詮釋之下反而顯得有條理,或至少讓人可以接受。第一次有這種想法,是看到下面這個影片的時候;音樂是希臘作曲家Iannis Xenakis的Nomos Alpha


我現在只希望以後也能夠參與這樣的表演,而且愈快有機會出現愈好,因為我又找到了對表演的熱情了!